State of Proof

Mathematical claim · docket-ready · examination not started

Improved bounds for the smallest 4-chromatic graph of girth six

Glauco Rampone.

Source date: 2026-08-24 · Added: 2026-08-27 · Record updated:

Inclusion is not validation. This is an intake record and proposed check plan, not a completed examination or a peer-review decision. Any separate docket states its own exact source and scope.

Docket-ready · added · 2608.23652

A smaller impossible-to-three-color network has been found

What it is
A paper reports a 64-node network with no short loops that still needs four colors, supported by SAT and Lean certificates.
Who did it
Glauco Rampone
What it could mean
Even a network without short loops can demand four colors. This 64-node construction would tighten the known size range—and show how computer searches can leave evidence others can replay.

Examination not started

See the check plan

Evidence & validation

From announcement to evidence

Discovery recorded. State of Proof has not yet examined this claim.

  1. Read the original work

    Improved bounds for the smallest 4-chromatic graph of girth six ↗

    Glauco Rampone.

  2. See the proposed checks

    Re-run the witness and SAT/Lean checks from locked sources; separately examination the exhaustive lower-bound computation; highest risk is completeness of the search/certificate bridge for the lower bound.

  3. No proof docket yet

    A docket is the public record of checks and open questions. This paper does not have one yet; the check plan above describes work still to do.

    Explore existing proof dockets →
How validation works →
What it claims
Improves the known range to (29 ≤ n₆(4) ≤ 64), supplies an explicit 64-vertex witness, and reports a Lean-checked non-3-colourability certificate.
Why this could matter
A smaller impossible-to-three-color network has been found The paper finds a 64-node network with no short loops that still needs four colors, then uses SAT and Lean certificates to check it. It advances both an extremal graph puzzle and reviewable computer-assisted mathematics.
If it holds up
Methods: it tightens the known size range and demonstrates how search, independent code, certificates, and formal proof can support one verifiable result.
If it does not
The failure would expose whether the graph witness, exhaustive search, SAT certificate, or formal checker broke—valuable evidence for better verification pipelines.
Impact horizon
Methods · Graph theory · Formal verification · SAT solving
Version
submitted 2026-08-24 11:14:46 UTC.
Why we tracked it
a narrowly stated extremal result with independent scripts, SAT certificates, and a linked Lean 4 formalization.
Highest-risk dependency
completeness of the search/certificate bridge for the lower bound.
Available artifacts
New Slack discovery packet; G64 repository, independent scripts, SAT certificates, and Lean 4 proof are linked by the primary record.
Current boundary
Intake record only; examination not started.

Back to this paper in Paper Watch · Public records as JSON · Suggest a correction