Number-pair exceptions may form a surprisingly large fractal
- What it is
- A paper claims that failures of a uniform number-approximation rule form a large fractal family, not isolated exceptions.
- Who did it
- Nikita Shulga
- What it could mean
- The failures are not isolated glitches; they form a substantial fractal landscape. This result would measure how extensively a uniform number-approximation rule breaks down, without resolving the classical Littlewood conjecture.
See the check plan
Evidence & validation
From announcement to evidence
Discovery recorded. State of Proof has not yet examined this claim.
Read the original work
The uniform Littlewood conjecture fails on a set of positive Hausdorff dimension ↗See the proposed checks
Pin the exact ULC quantifiers, verify the dimension argument, and trace dependence on Schleischitz's earlier counterexample result; highest risk is conflation with classical Littlewood.
No proof docket yet
A docket is the public record of checks and open questions. This paper does not have one yet; the check plan above describes work still to do.
Explore existing proof dockets →
- What it claims
- Establishes a Hausdorff-dimension-at-least-3/2 counterexample set in a badly-approximable slice and a full-dimension projection statement for the uniform—not classical—Littlewood conjecture.
- Why this could matter
- Number-pair exceptions may form a surprisingly large fractal A uniform number-approximation rule was already known to fail. This paper says the failures occupy a genuinely large fractal family, changing them from isolated oddities into a substantial part of the mathematical landscape.
- If it holds up
- Foundational: researchers gain a quantitative map of where uniform simultaneous approximation fails, with new tools for measuring exceptional fractal sets.
- If it does not
- The known counterexamples remain, but claims that they form a large fractal family must be scaled back.
- Impact horizon
- Foundational · Diophantine approximation · Fractal geometry · Number theory
- Version
- submitted 2026-08-25 18:54:02 UTC.
- Why we tracked it
- a fresh quantitative refinement of a recently claimed ULC failure, with a concrete dimension assertion.
- Highest-risk dependency
- conflation with classical Littlewood.
- Available artifacts
- New Slack discovery packet; no formal/code artifact listed.
- Current boundary
- Intake record only; examination not started.