State of Proof

Mathematical claim · candidate · examination not started

A counterexample to Kanalas' problem of continuously realising types

Morgan Rogers; Joshua Wrigley.

Source date: 2026-08-26 · Added: 2026-08-27 · Record updated:

Inclusion is not validation. This is an intake record and proposed check plan, not a completed examination or a peer-review decision. Any separate docket states its own exact source and scope.

Candidate · added · 2608.25688

Smooth local choices can still refuse to assemble

What it is
A paper claims a counterexample showing that continuously changing compatible information need not combine into one global mathematical model.
Who did it
Morgan Rogers and Joshua Wrigley
What it could mean
All the local pieces can look compatible without a whole ever existing. This counterexample would expose that trap in mathematical model-building: continuous local information is not automatically a global solution.

Examination not started

See the check plan

Evidence & validation

From announcement to evidence

Discovery recorded. State of Proof has not yet examined this claim.

  1. Read the original work

    A counterexample to Kanalas' problem of continuously realising types ↗

    Morgan Rogers; Joshua Wrigley.

  2. See the proposed checks

    Map coherence, continuity, fibre realization, and sheaf-model notions to the original problem; highest risk is a mismatch between the construction and Kanalas' hypotheses.

  3. No proof docket yet

    A docket is the public record of checks and open questions. This paper does not have one yet; the check plan above describes work still to do.

    Explore existing proof dockets →
How validation works →
What it claims
Gives a coherent theory, space, and continuous type assignment for which no corresponding sheaf model realizes the assigned types fibrewise, negatively answering a problem of Kristóf Kanalas.
Why this could matter
Smooth local choices can still refuse to assemble The paper tests a powerful mathematical instinct: if compatible information changes continuously from place to place, it should combine into one coherent global model. This counterexample says continuity alone is not enough.
If it holds up
Foundational: theories that build global objects from local data need stronger compatibility conditions, sharpening the logic behind sheaves and local-to-global reasoning.
If it does not
A promising local-to-global principle remains alive, and the attempted counterexample exposes which hypothesis actually guarantees assembly.
Impact horizon
Foundational · Logic · Category theory · Local-to-global models
Version
submitted 2026-08-26 12:08:01 UTC.
Why we tracked it
a compact negative answer with a claim-mappable construction.
Highest-risk dependency
a mismatch between the construction and Kanalas' hypotheses.
Available artifacts
New Slack discovery packet; no formal/code artifact listed.
Current boundary
Intake record only; examination not started.

Back to this paper in Paper Watch · Public records as JSON · Suggest a correction