A supposed universal law of entropy breaks
- What it is
- The paper claims smooth log-concave distributions can violate a proposed entropy pattern.
- Who did it
- Jiayang Zou, Luyao Fan, Jiayang Gao, and Jia Wang
- What it could mean
- Even beautifully smooth probability curves can break an elegant rule about how uncertainty spreads. These claimed counterexamples would tell information theorists exactly which tempting shortcut they cannot trust.
See the check plan
Evidence & validation
From announcement to evidence
Discovery recorded. State of Proof has not yet examined this claim.
Read the original work
An Explicit Family of Log-Concave Counterexamples to the Gaussian Completely Monotone Conjecture ↗See the proposed checks
Re-derive the two-frequency circular entropy calculation with exact/symbolic or interval arithmetic; examination the Gaussian-windowed heat-flow transfer; then verify that strict log-concavity and the sign persistence survive the localization and tensorization steps.
No proof docket yet
A docket is the public record of checks and open questions. This paper does not have one yet; the check plan above describes work still to do.
Explore existing proof dockets →
- What it claims
- The authors claim smooth, strictly log-concave examples in every dimension that violate Gaussian complete monotonicity; in dimension one, the claimed explicit family has a negative signed (m)-th entropy derivative for every sufficiently large (m), persisting for small positive time. The manuscript states that GPT-5.6 Sol Pro developed the proof under author guidance, making the source particularly relevant to the AI-assisted-proof watch lane.
- Why this could matter
- A supposed universal law of entropy breaks Entropy tracks how uncertainty spreads under heat-like smoothing, a core idea in probability and information theory. This AI-assisted proof claims a broad family of beautifully behaved distributions still violates the expected pattern.
- If it holds up
- Foundational: researchers lose a proposed universal shortcut for entropy inequalities and gain explicit stress tests for future theorems in information theory and probability.
- If it does not
- The conjecture survives, and the error would pinpoint whether the AI-assisted periodic calculation, real-line transfer, or tensorization went wrong.
- Impact horizon
- Foundational · Information theory · Entropy · AI-assisted proof
- Version
- submitted 2026-08-31 05:40:52 UTC
- Why we tracked it
- fresh explicit counterexample family to a named Gaussian-inequality conjecture, with an explicit AI-development disclosure but no supplied formal or executable certificate artifact.
- Highest-risk dependency
- The analytical bridge from the periodic calculation to the real-line heat-flow construction, and the all-dimension tensorization argument, are the load-bearing steps; an explicit family does not by itself expose a checkable sign certificate.
- Available artifacts
- arXiv supplies PDF, experimental HTML, and TeX source. No public formal proof, code, data, or numerical certificate repository is linked on the record.
- Current boundary
- Intake record only; examination not started.