Geometry has more tangent circles than we thought
- What it is
- The paper reports three curves with 144 shared tangent circles, exceeding a previously proposed maximum of 136.
- Who did it
- Taylor Brysiewicz
- What it could mean
- Three curves. 144 circles touching all three. If the construction checks out, it breaks the supposed ceiling of 136—and gives geometric solvers a tougher test of what they can find.
See the check plan
Evidence & validation
From announcement to evidence
Discovery recorded. State of Proof has not yet examined this claim.
Read the original work
144 real circles tangent to three conics ↗See the proposed checks
Extract the three conic equations and proposed circle data; use exact or certified interval algebra to verify tangency and realness, deduplicate circles, and confirm the count of 144; separately inspect the definition and provenance of the superseded 136 maximum.
No proof docket yet
A docket is the public record of checks and open questions. This paper does not have one yet; the check plan above describes work still to do.
Explore existing proof dockets →
- What it claims
- The manuscript exhibits three conics with 144 real tritangent circles, exceeding and thereby contradicting the conjectured maximum of 136. The finite claimed witness makes this a comparatively bounded algebraic-geometry intake target.
- Why this could matter
- Geometry has more tangent circles than we thought Three simple curves can share far more tangent circles than the previous proposed ceiling allowed: 144 instead of 136. That changes the landscape for a classic geometry-counting problem.
- If it holds up
- Enabling: geometric solvers and enumerative methods gain a tougher benchmark, improving how researchers count and certify all real solutions to tangency constraints.
- If it does not
- The 136 ceiling may survive; the examination would expose duplicated, non-real, or merely approximate circles.
- Impact horizon
- Enabling · Computational geometry · Algebraic geometry · Geometric solvers
- Version
- submitted 2026-09-01 16:50:11 UTC
- Why we tracked it
- a fresh, concrete counterexample to a stated extremal maximum, with a bounded numerical/algebraic verification route but no primary-record certificate artifact.
- Highest-risk dependency
- Numerical presentation alone can conceal multiplicity, non-real branches, or repeated solutions; the check must establish that 144 distinct real circles satisfy all three tangency conditions under the exact stated conics.
- Available artifacts
- arXiv provides PDF, experimental HTML, and TeX source; no linked formal proof, code, coordinates, or certificate repository was found on the primary record.
- Current boundary
- Intake record only; examination not started.